There are many reasons where such a tool can be put to good use: Whenever you have information that is so sensitive that it should not be readily available (think log files containing personal information, think passwords to important company systems known to only a few but access might be required after a major desaster for other) it might make sense to force a 4-eyes policy.<\/p>\n
First: This is not a question. And it is also not the answer to any possible question. I am not supporting in any way any usage of cryptography for unlawful purposes. It is the other way round: I believe that bad guys are already using such technologies. I also strongly believe that it can be used very positively instead.\u00a0 In fact, the building blocks of MEO are used very widely\u00a0 these days. Everything in MEO is used day-by-day by everybody doing shopping or banking on the internet. There is actually no cryptographic software involved beyond what is provided by the OpenSSL project<\/a> (which powers the SSL functionality on most Linux-based webservers) and other standard software.<\/p>\n Because I haven’t made my mind up yet about any possible implications this might have. After all: this may count as cryptographic software and may be governed by special export rules. Almost all source hosting services are located in the US, and I am not.<\/p>\n The tool is dual licensed: It is open source software using the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3<\/a> and it could be licensed commercially.<\/p>\nWhy don’t you host it on GitHub, Sourceforge, BitKeeper,…?<\/h3>\n
What is the License of the MEO tool?<\/h3>\n
Where is the Repo? How can I contribute?<\/h3>\n